Miley Cyrus first issued this statement about her controversial photos for Vanity Fair magazine:

“I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed,” she says. “I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about.’”

The Disney Channel is also standing up for its beloved starlet, telling E! News “a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines.”

Now some so called source is trying to explain the unexplainable:

Though Cyrus�s parents left before the final shot, with Miley supposed to be appearing topless, the source said: �Miley�s grandmother and her teacher were there when she shot it. Annie convinced them it was going to be artistic. Her parents are mortified. They know this is a learning moment for Miley.

�The photo suggests that she is [naked], but she is not. She is covered by a sheet, and beneath the sheet she is clothed. Originally, she was in a flesh-colored tank top but was asked to remove it.�

Yeah, right! Blame it all on the photographer, that�s easy what is hard is take responsibilities for your actions. Of course when you are used to take some very naughty photos and put them on MySpace, a topless but covered photo seems like pretty easy.

Anyway the magazine still had the choice not to publish it, right? Vanity Fair defends the photo shoot:

“Miley’s parents and/or minders were on the set all day. Since the photo was taken digitally, they saw it on the shoot and everyone thought it was a beautiful and natural portrait of Miley,” the magazine says.

“In fact, when Bruce Handy interviewed Miley, he asked her about the photo and she was very cheerful about it and thought it was perfectly fine.”

Should we boycott Vanity Fair?? Or is it Pop Fiction??

Photo Source: E!

DROP A COMMENT BELOW